I think most of us, if pressed, would admit to having something we
care about enough that it counts as an obsession. Not necessarily to
the point of a disorder, but something we know we attend to in a manner
that is out of proportion compared to what everyone else around us seems
to do. I think this tendency can either be exacerbated or broken when
one becomes a parent because having children forces you to reexamine
many priorities.
I bring this up because I just finished working on my latest stack of
photos, which is one of my running obsessions. Many years ago after
college while I was packing to move I began sorting through boxes and
boxes of photos. I was surprised at just how many images were of events
that I was sure I would never ever forget, but then I couldn’t even pin
down what year they were from. I love having photos of people and
places that interest me, but digging through heaps of pictures in boxes
was unpleasant. I decided right then that if I were going to bother to
take pictures I needed to start marking them and putting them in some
kind of order. I went out and bought albums and spent a week sorting
through all the pictures and labeling them and putting them where I
could find them again.
I became extra diligent about this once I started having children, which
is good because I apparently only make one model of kid and their baby
pictures are very hard to tell apart. I also paid attention to all the
stories I heard from people who took a million photos of their first
child and fewer and fewer of each subsequent child, so I made sure there
is an equal number of too many photos of all my kids. I’m not to the
point of doing any kind of attractive scrap-booking or anything that
elaborate, but all my kids have labeled and dated pictures in albums,
and that makes me feel good. I’m sure I’m messing other things up, but
the photo thing I’ve got down and they can’t accuse me of not
documenting their childhoods.
It’s funny to me when I think about how reluctant I was to get my
first digital camera. We bought one on a family trip when my regular
35mm Kodak bit the dust, and from the first shot I realized what an
improvement it was. I remember having the thought that I would miss the
surprise of getting my photos developed and seeing what I really had,
but from that initial photo of me and Mona where I could look at it
right away and know if our eyes were open or the composition was off was
terrific.
(Me and Mona in 2005)
I love having access to images (like that one) right on my computer,
and that the information about the dates they were taken is so easy to
find. I used to sit with a calendar when I labeled Aden’s baby pictures
and try to remember exactly which day we went to the zoo or museum.
Someday I hope to take some time to scan all my older photos into
digital form, but that won’t be for awhile. (That sounds like a good
nostalgia project to do when my kids are much older.)
In any case, I
talk to enough other parents about how they never get around to printing
out pictures, let alone put together albums, that I always feel a bit
self-conscious about my obsession. It’s just that I know how much I
like having real photographs to hold and look at to help me remember
things, and I think one day my kids will appreciate being able to flip
through whole albums of themselves when they were young.
Anyway, one of the casualties of the readjustment period of having Ian home again
was that I got obscenely behind in the whole photograph thing. I try
to be in a habit of emptying out my digital camera about once every
month, so that way there isn’t too much to do. And labeling photos (and
sorting out doubles to mail to friends and family) is an easy activity
for when I’m stuck in the house. It’s the kind of project that I can do
in the room with the kids while they do their own things and I can stop
and start as they need me without a problem.
But with Ian home I’ve
been able to escape the house more, and those stretches of time to do my
photo thing kind of evaporated. So the stack of photos I “needed” to
attend to went back months and was probably about seven inches tall.
It’s those moments where I’m drowning in photos that I wonder if it’s
worth it.
That’s the thing about feeling a bit obsessed–you can’t just take
it or leave it. The photo thing is not that casual for me. I can’t
leave it. So I stayed up late and sacrificed my day off for building my
own instruments just to get caught up. I like the feeling of being
caught up. The problem is I seem to choose any number of projects that
never feel like they will be caught up, and I then I try to decide if
they mean enough to bother worrying about them.
The other big one for me that seems to hang over my head all the time
is that I write a letter to each of my kids on their birthdays about
what they were like for the past year. It’s a place to stick all their
cutest quotes and record all their firsts and describe where they’ve
been, who they’ve met and what they’ve done. It’s a nice idea, and I
like the letters I’ve written and tucked away to give them when they
turn 18, but the process got really botched with the deployments. There
just wasn’t enough time for everything when Ian was in Iraq, and the
letter project was hit hard. Several of the letters are in rough
outline form with chunks of detail that need serious editing, and it’s
something I need big blocks of time to read through and sort out. I sat
down to write Quinn’s latest letter on his birthday this week (my baby
is four!) and realized to my dismay that last year’s letter is still a
mess. I thought I’d at least gotten caught up with Quinn, but no. It’s
depressing.
And I know this is a pressure I’ve invented to put on myself, and
that no one is requiring this of me, and I could just let it go, but I
don’t want to. It’s something in my head that I care about, and I feel
as if with the right determination I could do it.
I wonder why some things we can let go and others we let have power
over us. I used to be particular about setting silverware correctly,
but since having kids I don’t care. I notice when it isn’t “right” but
it doesn’t bother me. Whatever weird arrangements of spoons Mona or
Quinn lays out is fine. Adjusting to life with kids has meant learning
to relax my attitude about a lot of things, but the few places left for
me to channel my more obsessive energies I am keenly aware of.
Does anyone else out there have obsessive arbitrary projects that
they question from time to time? Or am I just trying to make myself
feel better by presuming other people do their own version of this too?
I’m curious to know.
Showing posts with label letters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label letters. Show all posts
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Contact (Babble)
Someone asked in a comment thread something I get asked in person all the time: How much contact do I have with my husband during his deployment?
The answer is not much, but way more than people had before email. My grandmother actually gave birth to her second child while my grandfather was off in the Navy during World War Two, and there was no way to tell him he had a son. She wondered for very long periods of time if her husband was okay. That sounds unbearable. By comparison, the longest stretch I’ve gone without hearing from Ian is maybe a month. I’m able to scan things to show him if I have questions about bills or taxes. He sends me brief notes on important days like anniversaries. A couple of times we’ve been able to talk to each other on Skype, which is interesting because we’ve gotten to see the room where he lives and works, but the time difference is a problem. Iraq is nine hours ahead of Wisconsin, so he’s usually going to sleep as we’re getting up, and there is no good time to talk.
I feel badly that I haven’t sent him as many packages as I should. I sent one big one before his leave and one after. I usually send DVDs of the kids, photos, artwork the kids made, a local paper of some sort, cookies, a letter, and anything else lying around that would remind him of home. The hard part about putting together a package (besides making sure any food won’t melt or rot in the 135 degree heat over the two week journey) is sending things that are meaningful without being too precious. Ian worries about leaving things behind when he comes home. I assure him the photos are replaceable, the kids are always cranking out artwork, and none of us would mind if he passed on little gifts to people there.
He’s sent a couple of things to us, including a toy camel, some pretty chai sets that the girls adore, a small vase…. My favorite things are the rare letter, and the last deployment he sent me a simple necklace with a pearl on it that I wear quite often. I don’t write him as much as I should, but he does follow this blog, and I do email notes reminding him he’s missed and we love him. I figure with limited time on my hands my priorities have to be with my kids and our life here. He’s an adult and I trust him to take care of himself and to remember we love him even if we don’t get to tell him every day. If I have a choice between playing a game with the kids or writing to their dad, I hope he understands that I need to focus on the kids.
The hardest thing about communicating with my husband while he’s overseas isn’t the how, it’s the what. We can stay in pretty good contact using a combination of letters and email and Skype and occasional phone calls, but time apart makes what to say harder to come by. It’s often easier to find things to talk about with someone I saw yesterday than it is to someone I see rarely. That seems counter-intuitive, since there would be more to catch up on with someone you haven’t talked to in a long time, but you lose common ground. The flow of conversation is harder to establish when there is too much to tell.
With Ian it gets very frustrating because we are used to talking to each other easily, but after so many months apart once we say, “I love you, I miss you,” several times, it’s hard to think of anything to add. He doesn’t have a current idea of what our lives are like at this point–small changes add up and turn into big changes. Anyone with little children knows how much is different in just a few months, let alone a year. We’ve moved, the kids are older, there are new people in our lives he doesn’t know…. I’m sure I’ve changed in ways I don’t even realize. And the thing is if I try to describe things really well, in some ways I think it only highlights for Ian how disconnected he is from us now, rather than helping him feel included. No one wants to have home explained to them. In the meantime I can’t relate to what his days are like at all. Most of what he describes I either don’t understand or don’t want to know because it scares me. He doesn’t want to add to my stress, but everything about him being in Iraq causes me stress, so what can he say? Not being able to find things to talk about makes us both feel bad, so just because we can talk doesn’t mean it’s always a good idea.
We’re also both limited by what we are allowed to say or simply shouldn’t. From his end, my husband is an officer, and privileged to sensitive information. He can tell us a little bit about what he’s doing, but sometimes in emails he has to change names of places and people. Email is convenient but not private. We have to assume whatever we write may be seen by others. That could include the people he’s fighting, so for safety reasons he can never tell me when he’s coming or going.
On my end, it’s unfair to burden him with any problems he can’t fix. It’s a nice idea to keep him informed of important details, but I can’t tell him about a trip to the emergency room, for instance, until it’s resolved. I can’t tell him anything with loose ends because it’s cruel. I don’t want him distracted because he has dangerous work to do. Complaining to him about my problems would be selfish, but I don’t want to lie to him either. If I told him everything was perfect he would worry because he would know that wasn’t true. So I keep him informed after the fact. Quinn was sick but now he’s fine, the insurance thing at work was messy but now it’s taken care of, selling the old house was tricky but now it’s done. When I talk to Ian on the phone there is a time delay not just in the sounds we’re hearing, but in the topics we can discuss. It’s awkward, but it’s what we’ve got.
Our circumstance may or may not be typical. He tells me for most soldiers it depends on time and opportunity. He knows other people who contact home every day because they have the free time to do it. Ian tends to be extremely busy with no days off. (People always seem surprised when I say he doesn’t have days off, and I remind them it’s a war.) It’s usually inconvenient times like midnight or very early morning or dinnertime here when he would be available to chat, and most of the time that doesn’t work out well.
Recently we had a discussion where he asked if I could please find a way for him to talk to the kids one on one when he calls. I’m used to having all the kids with me all the time, so when he calls I tend to put him on speaker phone and then it gets to be a mess. I explained to the kids that we’d have to take turns and be in different rooms, and they agreed, and the last call went much better.
In terms of making decisions, my husband trusts me to make choices that are good for our family and our future. That’s part of why he loves me to start with. When it comes to our home or the kids’ school or major purchases, he knows I’m not going to get us into debt or do something ridiculous. The craziest thing I did was move, and it was the right thing. It was hard to do without him, but I’m glad I did it. I can take care of everything with him gone, I just prefer to do it with him. Some things he definitely does better than I do (he doesn’t cry about computer problems, for example), but I know for a fact he doesn’t really want to pick out rugs or futon covers. We make a good team. I’m just looking forward to the team all being in the same time zone again.
(A picture Ian took of us almost exactly one year ago when I was first putting together this blog and Babble needed photos.)
(This is a photo of us exactly one year later taken by Aden’s friend Karla. My baby isn’t a baby anymore, Aden seems more grown up, and Mona’s clothes don’t stay on very well. But it’s still us. I think Ian will know us when we finally meet him at the airport and decide we’re worth coming home with.)
The answer is not much, but way more than people had before email. My grandmother actually gave birth to her second child while my grandfather was off in the Navy during World War Two, and there was no way to tell him he had a son. She wondered for very long periods of time if her husband was okay. That sounds unbearable. By comparison, the longest stretch I’ve gone without hearing from Ian is maybe a month. I’m able to scan things to show him if I have questions about bills or taxes. He sends me brief notes on important days like anniversaries. A couple of times we’ve been able to talk to each other on Skype, which is interesting because we’ve gotten to see the room where he lives and works, but the time difference is a problem. Iraq is nine hours ahead of Wisconsin, so he’s usually going to sleep as we’re getting up, and there is no good time to talk.
I feel badly that I haven’t sent him as many packages as I should. I sent one big one before his leave and one after. I usually send DVDs of the kids, photos, artwork the kids made, a local paper of some sort, cookies, a letter, and anything else lying around that would remind him of home. The hard part about putting together a package (besides making sure any food won’t melt or rot in the 135 degree heat over the two week journey) is sending things that are meaningful without being too precious. Ian worries about leaving things behind when he comes home. I assure him the photos are replaceable, the kids are always cranking out artwork, and none of us would mind if he passed on little gifts to people there.
He’s sent a couple of things to us, including a toy camel, some pretty chai sets that the girls adore, a small vase…. My favorite things are the rare letter, and the last deployment he sent me a simple necklace with a pearl on it that I wear quite often. I don’t write him as much as I should, but he does follow this blog, and I do email notes reminding him he’s missed and we love him. I figure with limited time on my hands my priorities have to be with my kids and our life here. He’s an adult and I trust him to take care of himself and to remember we love him even if we don’t get to tell him every day. If I have a choice between playing a game with the kids or writing to their dad, I hope he understands that I need to focus on the kids.
The hardest thing about communicating with my husband while he’s overseas isn’t the how, it’s the what. We can stay in pretty good contact using a combination of letters and email and Skype and occasional phone calls, but time apart makes what to say harder to come by. It’s often easier to find things to talk about with someone I saw yesterday than it is to someone I see rarely. That seems counter-intuitive, since there would be more to catch up on with someone you haven’t talked to in a long time, but you lose common ground. The flow of conversation is harder to establish when there is too much to tell.
With Ian it gets very frustrating because we are used to talking to each other easily, but after so many months apart once we say, “I love you, I miss you,” several times, it’s hard to think of anything to add. He doesn’t have a current idea of what our lives are like at this point–small changes add up and turn into big changes. Anyone with little children knows how much is different in just a few months, let alone a year. We’ve moved, the kids are older, there are new people in our lives he doesn’t know…. I’m sure I’ve changed in ways I don’t even realize. And the thing is if I try to describe things really well, in some ways I think it only highlights for Ian how disconnected he is from us now, rather than helping him feel included. No one wants to have home explained to them. In the meantime I can’t relate to what his days are like at all. Most of what he describes I either don’t understand or don’t want to know because it scares me. He doesn’t want to add to my stress, but everything about him being in Iraq causes me stress, so what can he say? Not being able to find things to talk about makes us both feel bad, so just because we can talk doesn’t mean it’s always a good idea.
We’re also both limited by what we are allowed to say or simply shouldn’t. From his end, my husband is an officer, and privileged to sensitive information. He can tell us a little bit about what he’s doing, but sometimes in emails he has to change names of places and people. Email is convenient but not private. We have to assume whatever we write may be seen by others. That could include the people he’s fighting, so for safety reasons he can never tell me when he’s coming or going.
On my end, it’s unfair to burden him with any problems he can’t fix. It’s a nice idea to keep him informed of important details, but I can’t tell him about a trip to the emergency room, for instance, until it’s resolved. I can’t tell him anything with loose ends because it’s cruel. I don’t want him distracted because he has dangerous work to do. Complaining to him about my problems would be selfish, but I don’t want to lie to him either. If I told him everything was perfect he would worry because he would know that wasn’t true. So I keep him informed after the fact. Quinn was sick but now he’s fine, the insurance thing at work was messy but now it’s taken care of, selling the old house was tricky but now it’s done. When I talk to Ian on the phone there is a time delay not just in the sounds we’re hearing, but in the topics we can discuss. It’s awkward, but it’s what we’ve got.
Our circumstance may or may not be typical. He tells me for most soldiers it depends on time and opportunity. He knows other people who contact home every day because they have the free time to do it. Ian tends to be extremely busy with no days off. (People always seem surprised when I say he doesn’t have days off, and I remind them it’s a war.) It’s usually inconvenient times like midnight or very early morning or dinnertime here when he would be available to chat, and most of the time that doesn’t work out well.
Recently we had a discussion where he asked if I could please find a way for him to talk to the kids one on one when he calls. I’m used to having all the kids with me all the time, so when he calls I tend to put him on speaker phone and then it gets to be a mess. I explained to the kids that we’d have to take turns and be in different rooms, and they agreed, and the last call went much better.
In terms of making decisions, my husband trusts me to make choices that are good for our family and our future. That’s part of why he loves me to start with. When it comes to our home or the kids’ school or major purchases, he knows I’m not going to get us into debt or do something ridiculous. The craziest thing I did was move, and it was the right thing. It was hard to do without him, but I’m glad I did it. I can take care of everything with him gone, I just prefer to do it with him. Some things he definitely does better than I do (he doesn’t cry about computer problems, for example), but I know for a fact he doesn’t really want to pick out rugs or futon covers. We make a good team. I’m just looking forward to the team all being in the same time zone again.
(A picture Ian took of us almost exactly one year ago when I was first putting together this blog and Babble needed photos.)
(This is a photo of us exactly one year later taken by Aden’s friend Karla. My baby isn’t a baby anymore, Aden seems more grown up, and Mona’s clothes don’t stay on very well. But it’s still us. I think Ian will know us when we finally meet him at the airport and decide we’re worth coming home with.)
Labels:
Army,
deployment,
home,
Ian,
Iraq,
letters,
parenting,
phone calls,
transition
Friday, March 26, 2010
In Defense of Handwriting (Babble)
There have been several articles here and there recently about
whether or not children should still be taught cursive in school. The
first time I came across one I didn’t give it much thought. My reaction
was some version of “whatever” and I didn’t dwell on it. I had a vague
question in my head about what that would mean for how people would
develop their signatures for signing documents in the future, but beyond
that it didn’t seem important.
But I’ve had more time to consider it, and I’m coming down squarely on the side of teaching handwriting to children.
I started thinking about this in more detail after a debate I had with one of my brothers over the holidays about spelling. One of the tangents that discussion took touched on handwriting, and he thinks it’s pointless. His arguments were that it was time wasted in school that could be used for better things, people use keyboards now, printing is clearer, not enough bang for your educational buck essentially.
My brother and I come from different places in our fields of study which likely affects our perspectives on many issues. He’s a scientist and is accustomed to stripping things down to quantifiable elements. Things he deals with need to be efficient, practical and show clear benefit or progress. Music has other aims. I want to capture something from the past with most of the music I play. I want to participate in a living tradition of musical knowledge passed down from one generation to another. I experience the value of doing things simply because they are beautiful in a way that doesn’t touch my brother’s work life in the same way. Science and music speak to different parts of the human condition and both help us understand our world and our place in it, but I think they prime our reactions as to what things are important quite differently.
So I’m leading with my weakest argument in favor of handwriting because it makes sense to me. (I’ve got practical points in a moment if this one seems irrelevant.) Handwriting done well is beautiful. There is value in that. How impressive is it that we remember John Hancock on the strength of his extravagant signature? That’s some handwriting with impact. There was a girl I went to school with named Nicola, and I didn’t know her well, but I still remember her handwriting. It was sophisticated and gorgeous. My brother sarcastically suggested that we should keep cursive because “that’s how grandma did it.” But that’s not a joke to me. I like doing some things like grandma did it. There’s value in that too. Finding small ways to connect us to the past makes us less likely to forget our history. I’m not someone who thinks the past was better–I’m thrilled to be living in the here and now–but I also don’t think everything has to be streamlined to be good. Efficiency isn’t always an improvement. Sometimes it’s just cold.
If that’s too ethereal, here are the practical arguments in favor of handwriting. Sometimes you need to write by hand. That’s just true, regardless of technology. And it makes sense to learn to do it in a way that is both quick and understood by many. I have a dozen legal pads scrawled with my notes from four years of violin making school. That was not an environment that lent itself to taking notes on a laptop or other such device. I did transfer my notes at the end of each week onto my computer to print out in a more easily accessible form, but my original notes were invaluable. I have nice printing, but it’s slower. Cursive writing on paper was the most practical way to record the information I needed, and that’s been true for much of my life. I would be unhappy working on a novel that way, and I love typing these posts, but for writing on a post-it, or for jotting down information in an unexpected place, or slipping a note under a door, you still have to write. Electronic gadgets for writing are superior in many cases, but not for everything, and why limit yourself?
My favorite recent example of a moment when handwriting proved superior to technology was during the holidays when my whole family took a trip to the Art Institute of Chicago. I ended up watching all the tots in the kids’ area and had to be content with other people’s reports of the fabulous things they’d seen, and both my brothers had enjoyed the exhibit on the Arts and Crafts movement. Barrett pulled out his pamphlet with pictures of some of the more impressive furniture on display, and in one of the margins in his distinctive and lovely handwriting he’d put down a William Morris quote that moved him and that he wanted to remember. Arno also had recorded a quote that he wanted to share, but he’d spent a long amount of time typing it into his phone and it didn’t seem to have saved properly so I have no idea what it was. (He preferred to ignore the irony in this when I brought it up during our discussion later.)
Besides being a basic skill kids should learn because writing legibly is practical, I think there is something to giving them a way to train their hands. It takes practice to learn to control and strengthen the muscles in your hands well. More people should be trained in basic drawing skills because drawing is extremely useful (and is another area of education that is too thoughtlessly dismissed), and I think writing for many is the closest a lot of us get to drawing. If you develop the skills it takes to make clear curves and straight lines you have a lot of possiblities at your fingertips. Why not do that with writing? If you are going to spend time to learn to take an image in your mind and successfully get your hands to transfer it to the page, why not practice that with something so useful? You can’t expect kids to type on keyboards and then just magically know how to use their hands for something else. It doesn’t work that way. Practice is necessary, and that is not time wasted.
Writing things yourself also helps you process them in a different way. I know I make the most progress in teaching people to read music when I make them write it out themselves. Just because they’ve seen a treble clef and recognize it, doesn’t mean they have ever really taken the time to process what it really looks like. Making them think about it and engage different parts of their brain to write it out helps them learn. Writing helps teach you how to see.
And lastly, it’s personal. My brother tends to focus on the information that is being communicated as the central point. He doesn’t think the means by which an idea is displayed is relevant in most cases, and resents it when people’s ideas are judged unfairly based on presentation. I can see that, but the method does matter. That’s why even when typing you have to consider the font or color, etc., because it will affect the impact of your point. Ideas are important, but they are not everything. Sometimes you just want to hold something that you know another person held. When you take the time to write certain thoughts down, the mere act of writing them with your own hands is powerful.
I have probably a hundred fascinating, well-written, gripping, touching emails from my husband during his last deployment. I’m glad he shared those thoughts. But I also have two hand-written letters just to me from that same time, and which do you think I come back to most often? I don’t want to print out an email that says, “I love you” that looks the same as if I’d written it to myself some lonely afternoon. I want a piece of paper that was in Iraq with my husband, that he wrote on in his own slightly scrunchy handwriting, that tells me he was thinking of me when he put that pen to paper, and that is a unique reminder of the man I love. The idea is not always the same when you change the delivery. Sometimes the delivery is the idea. An education that does not prepare children to communicate their ideas in a way that is powerful and personal, efficient and beautiful, is not a full education.
My children go to a public Montessori school, and there they start cursive in kindergarten. I love seeing Aden’s homework all in cursive. She’s got a good hand and she’s improving all the time. I prefer a hand drawn and written birthday card from my daughter to something she could have printed out on the computer or bought in a store. I have a feeling my brother is just playing devil’s advocate with me on some of these points because I’ve seen the binder he has of all the letters his wife wrote to him from India before they were married. And his five year old daughter composed an inspiring ‘list for life’ that is moving because it was written in her own hand. The ideas are wonderful, but typed out would lack authenticity. Seeing the words “Be kind to people” in her childish printing gives it a heartfelt charm that the idea alone lacks. Her innocence shines through, and the sentiment is her own, not something anyone might have said.
Having given it this much thought, I’ve made an effort recently to work on my own handwriting. I tend to print because it’s clearer, but if I take a moment and use care, there is nothing about my handwriting that is hard to read. When I take the time anymore to write a real letter, I do it in cursive. Just like grandma did it.
But I’ve had more time to consider it, and I’m coming down squarely on the side of teaching handwriting to children.
I started thinking about this in more detail after a debate I had with one of my brothers over the holidays about spelling. One of the tangents that discussion took touched on handwriting, and he thinks it’s pointless. His arguments were that it was time wasted in school that could be used for better things, people use keyboards now, printing is clearer, not enough bang for your educational buck essentially.
My brother and I come from different places in our fields of study which likely affects our perspectives on many issues. He’s a scientist and is accustomed to stripping things down to quantifiable elements. Things he deals with need to be efficient, practical and show clear benefit or progress. Music has other aims. I want to capture something from the past with most of the music I play. I want to participate in a living tradition of musical knowledge passed down from one generation to another. I experience the value of doing things simply because they are beautiful in a way that doesn’t touch my brother’s work life in the same way. Science and music speak to different parts of the human condition and both help us understand our world and our place in it, but I think they prime our reactions as to what things are important quite differently.
So I’m leading with my weakest argument in favor of handwriting because it makes sense to me. (I’ve got practical points in a moment if this one seems irrelevant.) Handwriting done well is beautiful. There is value in that. How impressive is it that we remember John Hancock on the strength of his extravagant signature? That’s some handwriting with impact. There was a girl I went to school with named Nicola, and I didn’t know her well, but I still remember her handwriting. It was sophisticated and gorgeous. My brother sarcastically suggested that we should keep cursive because “that’s how grandma did it.” But that’s not a joke to me. I like doing some things like grandma did it. There’s value in that too. Finding small ways to connect us to the past makes us less likely to forget our history. I’m not someone who thinks the past was better–I’m thrilled to be living in the here and now–but I also don’t think everything has to be streamlined to be good. Efficiency isn’t always an improvement. Sometimes it’s just cold.
If that’s too ethereal, here are the practical arguments in favor of handwriting. Sometimes you need to write by hand. That’s just true, regardless of technology. And it makes sense to learn to do it in a way that is both quick and understood by many. I have a dozen legal pads scrawled with my notes from four years of violin making school. That was not an environment that lent itself to taking notes on a laptop or other such device. I did transfer my notes at the end of each week onto my computer to print out in a more easily accessible form, but my original notes were invaluable. I have nice printing, but it’s slower. Cursive writing on paper was the most practical way to record the information I needed, and that’s been true for much of my life. I would be unhappy working on a novel that way, and I love typing these posts, but for writing on a post-it, or for jotting down information in an unexpected place, or slipping a note under a door, you still have to write. Electronic gadgets for writing are superior in many cases, but not for everything, and why limit yourself?
My favorite recent example of a moment when handwriting proved superior to technology was during the holidays when my whole family took a trip to the Art Institute of Chicago. I ended up watching all the tots in the kids’ area and had to be content with other people’s reports of the fabulous things they’d seen, and both my brothers had enjoyed the exhibit on the Arts and Crafts movement. Barrett pulled out his pamphlet with pictures of some of the more impressive furniture on display, and in one of the margins in his distinctive and lovely handwriting he’d put down a William Morris quote that moved him and that he wanted to remember. Arno also had recorded a quote that he wanted to share, but he’d spent a long amount of time typing it into his phone and it didn’t seem to have saved properly so I have no idea what it was. (He preferred to ignore the irony in this when I brought it up during our discussion later.)
Besides being a basic skill kids should learn because writing legibly is practical, I think there is something to giving them a way to train their hands. It takes practice to learn to control and strengthen the muscles in your hands well. More people should be trained in basic drawing skills because drawing is extremely useful (and is another area of education that is too thoughtlessly dismissed), and I think writing for many is the closest a lot of us get to drawing. If you develop the skills it takes to make clear curves and straight lines you have a lot of possiblities at your fingertips. Why not do that with writing? If you are going to spend time to learn to take an image in your mind and successfully get your hands to transfer it to the page, why not practice that with something so useful? You can’t expect kids to type on keyboards and then just magically know how to use their hands for something else. It doesn’t work that way. Practice is necessary, and that is not time wasted.
Writing things yourself also helps you process them in a different way. I know I make the most progress in teaching people to read music when I make them write it out themselves. Just because they’ve seen a treble clef and recognize it, doesn’t mean they have ever really taken the time to process what it really looks like. Making them think about it and engage different parts of their brain to write it out helps them learn. Writing helps teach you how to see.
And lastly, it’s personal. My brother tends to focus on the information that is being communicated as the central point. He doesn’t think the means by which an idea is displayed is relevant in most cases, and resents it when people’s ideas are judged unfairly based on presentation. I can see that, but the method does matter. That’s why even when typing you have to consider the font or color, etc., because it will affect the impact of your point. Ideas are important, but they are not everything. Sometimes you just want to hold something that you know another person held. When you take the time to write certain thoughts down, the mere act of writing them with your own hands is powerful.
I have probably a hundred fascinating, well-written, gripping, touching emails from my husband during his last deployment. I’m glad he shared those thoughts. But I also have two hand-written letters just to me from that same time, and which do you think I come back to most often? I don’t want to print out an email that says, “I love you” that looks the same as if I’d written it to myself some lonely afternoon. I want a piece of paper that was in Iraq with my husband, that he wrote on in his own slightly scrunchy handwriting, that tells me he was thinking of me when he put that pen to paper, and that is a unique reminder of the man I love. The idea is not always the same when you change the delivery. Sometimes the delivery is the idea. An education that does not prepare children to communicate their ideas in a way that is powerful and personal, efficient and beautiful, is not a full education.
My children go to a public Montessori school, and there they start cursive in kindergarten. I love seeing Aden’s homework all in cursive. She’s got a good hand and she’s improving all the time. I prefer a hand drawn and written birthday card from my daughter to something she could have printed out on the computer or bought in a store. I have a feeling my brother is just playing devil’s advocate with me on some of these points because I’ve seen the binder he has of all the letters his wife wrote to him from India before they were married. And his five year old daughter composed an inspiring ‘list for life’ that is moving because it was written in her own hand. The ideas are wonderful, but typed out would lack authenticity. Seeing the words “Be kind to people” in her childish printing gives it a heartfelt charm that the idea alone lacks. Her innocence shines through, and the sentiment is her own, not something anyone might have said.
Having given it this much thought, I’ve made an effort recently to work on my own handwriting. I tend to print because it’s clearer, but if I take a moment and use care, there is nothing about my handwriting that is hard to read. When I take the time anymore to write a real letter, I do it in cursive. Just like grandma did it.
Labels:
cursive,
handwriting,
letters,
Montessori,
school,
technology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


